On June 18, 2026, Luoyang’s “Ancient Capital Night 8 PM” nighttime cultural tourism consumption policy saw an execution change that has drawn industry attention: the scope of application has been further extended from existing consumer scenarios to overseas visitors holding valid passports and entry visas, while also linking Hanfu experience services with outbound tax refund and cross-border payment settlement. For businesses operating Hanfu experience stores, travel photography service providers, payment service channels, and cultural tourism operators serving inbound consumers, this is not only a consumption-promotion measure, but also reflects the standardized advancement of nighttime cultural tourism services in compliance operations, payment integration, and tax-refund coordination.

Clear information from this adjustment

According to confirmed information, starting from June 18, 2026, the scope of Luoyang’s “Ancient Capital Night 8 PM” nighttime cultural tourism consumption policy will officially be expanded to overseas visitors holding valid passports and entry visas.

In terms of service content, eligible overseas visitors can enjoy a full-package service exemption for “Hanfu rental + professional styling + travel photography and photo-taking,” with a single-visit cap of RMB 398.

In terms of tax arrangements, this consumption item will also be combined with outbound tax refund, with a tax refund rate of 13%.

In terms of payment and settlement, the policy has been integrated into the international versions of Alipay and WeChat Pay Global, supporting real-time settlement by foreign bank cards and e-wallets.

In terms of scope of application, the policy covers more than 1,600 compliant Hanfu experience stores registered in Luoyang.

From stores to payment terminals, what is affected is more than just end-consumer spending

The conditions for compliant stores to accept orders are clearer

From an industry perspective, the first businesses directly affected are the compliant Hanfu experience stores registered in Luoyang. The reason is that this policy clearly defines the scope of application to compliant stores and links it with exemptions, tax refunds, and real-time settlement. For stores, the impact is mainly reflected in customer reception, order settlement, service packaging, and document retention. What deserves more attention now is whether they can continue to meet “compliance” requirements, and whether service information, transaction records, and settlement procedures can remain consistent with the policy implementation path when serving overseas visitors.

Travel photography and styling services enter a combined handover scenario

Unlike a single rental service, the exemption this time covers the full-package service of “Hanfu rental + professional styling + travel photography and photo-taking,” which means that styling and travel photography providers are also brought into the same handover chain. From an analysis perspective, the key points these service providers need to pay attention to are not only expected order growth, but also the contractual boundaries, order attribution, cost settlement, and supporting arrangements with stores under a combined-service model. Especially in scenarios involving exemption and tax refund overlap, which contents are included in the policy support scope, which materials need to be retained, and how they will be executed later are all parts that require close observation.

The real-time settlement requirements for cross-border payment services have been upgraded

The policy has been integrated into the international versions of Alipay and WeChat Pay Global, and supports real-time settlement by foreign bank cards and e-wallets, making the payment service link one of the key nodes for policy implementation. From an observation standpoint, relevant operators need to pay particular attention to payment method compatibility, settlement timing, transaction voucher retention, and front-end operational standards, because these links are directly related to the realization of discounts and the visitor experience. For stores relying on on-site transactions, whether cross-border payments go smoothly is no longer just a payment issue; it is also related to whether the policy can be stably implemented at the terminal.

Tax-refund coordination makes cultural tourism spending and document management more tightly linked

With the outbound tax refund rate clearly set at 13%, the nighttime cultural tourism consumption scenario targeting overseas visitors now has a more direct connection with tax-refund rules. For the operators involved, the impact may be more reflected in supporting links such as vouchers, transaction information, and service confirmation. From an analysis perspective, all business links related to tax refunds require greater attention to consistency in invoices, order information, and payment records; for stores and service staff that need to communicate with visitors during the process, how to reduce execution deviations caused by inconsistent documentation will also become a focus in actual operations.

What the enterprise should pay attention to now

First verify the “eligible to participate” qualifications, not just the traffic opportunity

For the relevant operators, the first thing to pay attention to is whether they are compliant Hanfu experience stores registered in Luoyang, because this is the currently confirmed eligibility boundary. From an analysis perspective, the importance of this information is greater than short-term marketing judgment, because only when the qualification boundary is clear can the subsequent exemption, settlement, and tax-refund alignment be grounded.

Treat transaction traces as part of the execution process

Because the policy simultaneously involves overseas visitor identity conditions, real-time settlement, and outbound tax refunds, enterprises need to pay attention to whether the information among orders, payments, and service fulfillment can correspond consistently. The current input information does not provide more detailed execution rules, so it is more appropriate to understand it as: enterprises should place greater emphasis on material retention, front-end verification, and internal process alignment in advance, rather than assuming that all operational details are already fully clear.

Pay attention to front-end service capabilities under cross-border payment interfaces

For stores, travel photography teams, and related service personnel, payment tools are no longer just settlement tools, but part of the policy realization chain. From an observation perspective, enterprises should continue to pay attention to the operational stability and service guidance changes under the settlement scenarios of Alipay International, WeChat Pay Global, and foreign bank cards and e-wallets, so as to avoid order delivery being affected by inconsistent front-end execution.

Keep tracking the specific channels for tax refunds and discount stacking

At present, it has been confirmed that the exemption policy can be combined with the 13% outbound tax refund, but the more specific application channels, material requirements, and on-site execution methods have not yet been fully outlined in the input information. For enterprises, more attention should be paid to subsequent public statements, implementation replies, and changes in business documents, especially practical issues such as the applicable boundary for discounts, recognition of a single transaction, and material review requirements.

This looks more like an execution signal than a pure promotion

From an editorial perspective, the key point of this piece of information is not only the “exemption” itself, but that it places inbound tourists, compliant stores, cross-border payments, and outbound tax refunds into the same nighttime cultural tourism consumption scenario. This arrangement is more appropriately understood as a signal that has already been put into practice: local cultural tourism consumption policies are trying to connect with the convenience of inbound consumption, payment availability, and compliance operating requirements.

At the same time, it should also be noted that the currently known information mainly points to policy scope, discount content, payment access, and the number of covered stores, while the more detailed execution standards have not been fully expanded. Therefore, the industry should not directly infer stable conclusions or long-term trends when interpreting it, but should continue to observe whether subsequent channels become clearer and what practical issues front-line stores and service chains reflect during implementation.

What it means for the market, and how it should be understood now

Taken together, this change first shows that Luoyang’s nighttime cultural tourism consumption policy has expanded from a local consumption-promotion tool to an execution arrangement that is closer to the spending scenarios of inbound tourists. For businesses related to Hanfu experiences, styling, travel photography, payment settlement, and tax-refund coordination, the real focus is not only on the possible increase in customer flow, but on whether the business can complete compliant, traceable, and well-connected delivery within the compliant framework.

At present, it is more appropriate to understand this piece of information as a clearly launched policy execution change, and also as a rules dynamic that still requires close observation of detailed implementation and industry feedback. For enterprises, the rational approach is to follow business opportunities while paying attention to subsequent implementation channels, rather than amplifying unconfirmed market conclusions in advance.

Basis of this article and direction for follow-up verification

This article was generated based on the user-provided news title, event time, and event summary. The information used only includes the policy effective time, eligible audience, exemption content, tax refund rate, payment access method, and applicable store scope.

For this type of event, it is usually still necessary to combine official announcements, releases from regulatory authorities, information from customs or trade主管部门, industry association information, standard or rule documents, and reports from authoritative media for further cross-verification.

Since the input does not provide a specific official source link, this article cannot further confirm more detailed execution details. Follow-up attention should still be paid to policy specifics, tax-refund implementation channels, payment settlement requirements, store compliance recognition methods, changes in business documents, and industry feedback as well as actual implementation by enterprises.